Accountability of Temporary Land Deed Official Not Included as Defendants in Deed Revocation Rulings
Study of Verdict Number 601/Pdt.G/2020/Pa.Tnk.
Keywords:
PPATS, Grant Deed, ResponsibilityAbstract
This study examines the role of the Temporary Land Deed Official (PPATS) in the issuance of legally defective deeds. The case, as adjudicated in Verdict Number 601/Pdt.G/2020/PA.Tnk, indicates that the PPATS was neither designated as a Co-Defendant nor held materially liable to the disputing parties. In the court's consideration, the judge reasoned that the PPATS was not directly implicated in the case since the Grant Deed (Akta Hibah) was not annulled, but rather the "grant" itself. Nevertheless, the judge ruled that the Grant Deed was legally defective, lacked binding legal force, and was declared null and void by operation of law. Consequently, the verdict contains a formal defect (plurium litis consortium) due to the absence of a complete set of necessary parties in the lawsuit, which, in principle, should have resulted in the dismissal of the case. This study addresses two main issues: (1) the legal consequences of a Grant Deed that is null and void by operation of law, and (2) the actions that the PPATS can take to maintain their integrity and professional accountability in the event of such a declaration. This research employs a normative legal approach, utilizing the theory of legal responsibility as its analytical framework.
Downloads
References
Adjie, Habib. Kebatalan Dan Pembatalan Akta Notaris. Bandung: Refika Aditama, 2011.
Adolf, Jozan, and Widhi Handoko. “Eksistensi Wewenang Notaris Dalam Pembuatan Akta Bidang Pertanahan.” Notarius 13, no. 1 (2020): 181–92. https://doi.org/10.14710/NTS.V13I1.29313.
Anggraeni, Shirley Zerlinda, and Marwanto. “Kewenangan Dan Tanggung Jawab Hukum Pejabat Pembuat Akta Tanah Dalam Pelaksanaan Pendaftaran Hak Tanggungan Secara Elektronik.” Acta Comitas : Jurnal Hukum Kenotariatan 5, no. 2 (2020): 261–73. https://doi.org/10.24843/AC.2020.V05.I02.P05.
Ardiansyah, Erlan, Mohammad Saleh, and Rahmia Rachman. “Batasan Tanggungjawab Notaris Terhadap Akta Autentik Yang Dibuatnya.” Recital Review 4, no. 2 (2022): 432–51. https://doi.org/10.22437/RR.V4I2.18867.
Aulia, Arsiendy. “Prinsip Kehati-Hatian PPAT Dalam Proses Pengikatan Jual Beli Tanah Sebagai Perwujudan Kepastian Hukum.” Recital Review 4, no. 1 (2022): 244–78. https://doi.org/10.22437/RR.V4I1.13364.
Efendi, Aan, and Dyah Octhorina Susanti. Penelitian Hukum (Legal Research). Jakarta: Sinar Grafika, 2018.
Fajrimustika, Nurvannisa, and Fransiscus Xaverius Arsin. “Status Kepemilikan Rumah Yang Dibangun Di Atas Tanah Hibah Pasca Perkawinan Tanpa Perjanjian Kawin.” Kertha Semaya : Journal Ilmu Hukum 11, no. 11 (2023): 2694–2703. https://doi.org/10.24843/KS.2023.V11.I11.P15.
Hadi, Misbah Imam Soleh, and Bayu Indra Permana. “Kontruksi Hukum Pembebasan Pajak Penghasilan Terhadap Peralihan Hak Atas Tanah Dalam Pembagian Hak Bersama Waris.” Jurnal Ilmu Kenotariatan 3, no. 1 (2022): 1–13. https://doi.org/10.19184/jik.v3i1.34912.
Harahap, Yahya. Hukum Acara Perdata, Tentang Gugatan, Persidangan, Penyitaan, Pembuktian, Dan Putusan Pengadilan. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika, 2017.
Hariyanto, Malik, Prija Djatmika, and Diah Aju Wisnuwardhani. “Implementation of the Article 32 of Government Regulation Number 24 of 2016 Concerning Land Deed Official’s Honorarium.” Jurnal Ilmu Kenotariatan 5, no. 2 (2024): 123–37. https://doi.org/10.19184/jik.v5i2.52971.
Herusantoso, Bayu Praditya. “The Antinomy of Agrarian Reform Regulations After the Establishment of the Land Bank Authority.” Jurnal Ilmu Kenotariatan 5, no. 1 (2024): 17–27. https://doi.org/10.19184/jik.v5i1.46593.
Holla, Rafi Salhi, and Clarissa Oktaviriya Prakoso. “Legal Certainty Regarding the Conversion of Land Certificates To An Electronic System Based On Security Principles.” Jurnal Ilmu Kenotariatan 5, no. 2 (2024): 88–101. https://doi.org/10.19184/jik.v5i2.52007.
HS, Salim. Teknik Pembuatan Akta Pejabat Pembuat Akta Tanah (PPAT). Jakarta: Raja Grafindo, 2016.
Icksan, Mochamad. “Pembatalan Akta Pejabat Pembuat Akta Tanah Yang Dinilai Cacat Hukum Oleh Pejabat Badan Pertanahan Nasional.” Jurnal Ilmu Kenotariatan 3, no. 2 (2022): 95–104. https://doi.org/10.19184/jik.v3i2.36441.
Iryadi, Irfan. “Kepastian Hukum Kedudukan Camat Sebagai PPAT Sementara.” Negara Hukum: Membangun Hukum Untuk Keadilan Dan Kesejahteraan 11, no. 1 (2020): 1–17. https://doi.org/10.22212/JNH.V11I1.1547.
Marzuki, Peter Mahmud. Penelitian Hukum. Jakarta: Kencana, 2007.
———. Pengantar Ilmu Hukum. Jakarta: Kencana, 2008.
Megawati, Tiyas Putri, Aulia Dwi Ramadhanti, and Faizah Nur Fahmida. “Akibat Hukum Penandatanganan Surat Kuasa Jual Mutlak Sebelum Debitor Mengalami Kredit Macet.” Jurnal Ilmu Kenotariatan 5, no. 1 (2024): 76–87. https://doi.org/10.19184/jik.v5i1.47362.
Mentari, Mega, Ana Silviana, and Mira Novana Ardani. “Tanggung Jawab Pejabat Pembuat Akta Tanah Sementara Atau PPATS Terhadap Batas Waktu Pendaftaran Akta Jual Beli Tanah Berdasarkan Pasal 40 Peraturan Pemerintah Nomor 24 Tahun 1997 Tentang Pendaftaran Tanah (Studi Di Kota Depok).” Diponegoro Law Journal 9, no. 2 (2020): 359–72. https://doi.org/10.14710/DLJ.2020.26911.
Mertokusumo, Sudikno. Mengenal Hukum Suatu Pengantar. Yogyakarta: Liberty, 2005.
Nabil, Muhammad, and Nia Kurniati. “Hilangnya Keabsahan Hak Atas Tanah Akibat Kelalaian Pejabat Pembuat Akta Tanah.” LITRA: Jurnal Hukum Lingkungan, Tata Ruang, Dan Agraria 3, no. 1 (2023): 93–108. https://doi.org/10.23920/LITRA.V3I1.1358.
Nugraha, muhammad Iqbal Akbar, and Edith Ratna. “Penunjukan Camat Sebagai Pejabat Pembuat Akta Tanah Sementara Di Kota Tasikmalaya.” Notarius 15, no. 2 (2022): 638–48. https://doi.org/10.14710/NTS.V15I2.35954.
Prakasa, Fasatama, Mada Apriandi Zuhir, and Herman Adriansyah. “Pembatalan Sertifikat Hak Milik Dibebani Hak Tanggungan (Putusan Mahkamah Agung Nomor 1138 K/Pdt/2012).” Recital Review 2, no. 1 (2020): 39–53. https://online-journal.unja.ac.id/RR/article/view/8660.
Prakoso, Bhim, Bayu Indra Permana, Isro Vita Nugraningsih, and Clarissa Oktaviriya Prakoso. “The Legal Certainty of Wakaf Without The Existence of A Wakaf Power Deed Made by The Officer Making The Wakaf Power Deed.” Co-Value Jurnal Ekonomi Koperasi Dan Kewirausahaan 15, no. 2 (2024): 824–34. https://doi.org/10.59188/COVALUE.V15I2.4515.
Rahadjo, Satjipto. Ilmu Hukum. Bandung: Citra Aditya Bakti, 2000.
Rizal, Emha Ainun. “Tanggung Jawab PPAT Atas Pembatalan Akta Yang Dibuat Dihadapannya.” Officium Notarium 2, no. 2 (2022): 354–62. https://doi.org/10.20885/JON.VOL2.ISS2.ART17.
Sari, I Gusti Agung Dhenita, I Gusti Ngurah Wairocana, and Made Gde Subha Karma Resen. “Kewenangan Notaris Dan PPAT Dalam Proses Pemberian Hak Guna Bangunan Atas Tanah Hak Milik.” Acta Comitas : Jurnal Hukum Kenotariatan 3, no. 1 (2018): 41-58–41 – 58. https://doi.org/10.24843/AC.2018.V03.I01.P04.
Sari, Kirana Indra. “Pembatalan Akta Hibah PPAT Kepada Anak Angkat Tanpa Persetujuan Ahli Waris (Studi Kasus Putusan MA No. 1818K/Pdt/2008).” Jurnal Akta Notaris 3, no. 1 (2024): 16–30. https://doi.org/10.56444/AKTANOTARIS.V3I1.1680.
Setiawan, Khafid, Bhim Prakoso, and Moh. Ali. “Notaris Dalam Pembuatan Akta Kontrak Yang Berlandaskan Prinsip Kehati-Hatian.” Jurnal Ilmu Kenotariatan 2, no. 2 (2021): 43–52. https://doi.org/10.19184/jik.v2i2.20919.
Setyawan, Citra Adityana, and Antiko Wati. “Peralihan Hak Atas Tanah Dengan Kuitansi Jual Beli.” Jurnal Ilmu Kenotariatan 3, no. 1 (2022): 14–22. https://doi.org/10.19184/jik.v3i1.34913.
Surachman, Nur Fitriayu. “Kajian Pembuatan Akta Jual Beli Dari PPATS Sebelum Dan Sesudah Perkaban No. 8 Tahun 2012.” Otentik’s : Jurnal Hukum Kenotariatan 4, no. 1 (2022): 55–79. https://doi.org/10.35814/OTENTIK.V4I1.3345.
Syaputra, Maulana, Irhamsah, and Refki Ridwan. “Konsekuensi Hukum Dan Tanggung Jawab Notaris Terhadap Akta Yang Mengandung Unsur Penyalahgunaan Keadaan.” SENTRI: Jurnal Riset Ilmiah 3, no. 4 (2024): 1901–10. https://doi.org/10.55681/SENTRI.V3I4.2564.
Tira, Andi. “Perlindungan Pemegang Sertifikat Hak Milik Atas Tanah Melalui Keputusan Tata Usaha Negara.” Clavia: Jurnal of Law 17, no. 2 (2019): 15–30. https://journal.unibos.ac.id/clavia/article/view/1223.
Tjukup, I Ketut, I Wayan Bela Siki Layang, Nyoman A. Martana, I Ketut Markeling, Nyoman Satyayudha Dananjaya, I Putu Rasmadi Arsha Putra, Komang Widiana Purnawan, Made Diah Sekar Mayang Sari, Ketut Nihan Pundari, and Putu Ayu Ratih Tribuana. “Akta Notaris (Akta Otentik) Sebagai Alat Bukti Dalam Peristiwa Hukum Perdata.” Acta Comitas : Jurnal Hukum Kenotariatan 1, no. 2 (2016): 32. https://doi.org/10.24843/AC.2016.V01.I02.P05.
Udiyana, Ida Ayu Agung Nara Kirana, and I Made Sarjana. “Kajian Yuridis Terhadap Tanggung Jawab Notaris Dalam Pembuatan Surat Kuasa Membebankan Hak Tanggungan.” Acta Comitas : Jurnal Hukum Kenotariatan 6, no. 03 (2021): 667-678–667 – 678. https://doi.org/10.24843/AC.2021.V06.I03.P15.
Wau, Hilbertus Sumplisius M., and T. Keizerina Devi Azwar. “Intercept the Land Mafia: An Analysis of the Role of PPAT as a Shield in Illegal Property Transactions.” Jurnal Ilmu Kenotariatan 4, no. 2 (2023): 88–101. https://doi.org/10.19184/jik.v4i2.43203.
Zainuddin, Asriadi. “Perbandingan Hibah Menurut Hukum Perdata Dan Hukum Islam.” Jurnal Al Himayah 1, no. 1 (March 1, 2017): 92–105. https://journal.iaingorontalo.ac.id/index.php/ah/article/view/288.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Nilna Firkhana Soraya, Sukarmi, Patricia Audrey Ruslijanto
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
